Unnecessary Complexity Added by Shared Occupancy Test
By |Published On: 2nd August 2018|

Home » Uncategorised » Unnecessary Complexity Added by Shared Occupancy Test

Unnecessary Complexity Added by Shared Occupancy Test

By |Published On: 2nd August 2018|

This article is an external press release originally published on the Landlord News website, which has now been migrated to the Just Landlords blog.

The Government’s intentions to amend the rules on its ‘rent-a-room’ scheme which enables people to earn up to £7,500 a year tax-free from letting out a spare room, is likely to ‘add unnecessary complexity to the tax system, according to the Association of Accounting Technicians (AAT).

The introduction of a new shared occupancy test is yet to surface, meaning that relief can only be claimed when the landlord is present at the property during the rental period.

Furthermore, this means that those letting out their whole property will now have to pay more tax or to start paying tax if they have not done so previously.

It is the belief of the Government that the newly introduced changes will return the relief to its original purpose and confirm its role in the wider property tax regime.

The government policy paper states: “This ‘shared occupancy’ test will provide that the individual, or a member of their household, in receipt of income, must have a ‘shared occupancy’, a physical presence for all or part of the period of the rental, with the individual whose occupation of the furnished accommodation is generating receipts.

“Those taxpayers that do not satisfy this test will no longer be eligible to claim rent a room relief on those receipts.”

But the AAT fears that the new test will add unnecessary complexity to the tax system and has other shortfalls, particularly around how shared occupancy can be proved.

Phil Hall, AAT’s Head of Public Affairs & Public Policy, commented: “This will add unnecessary complexity to the tax system. Many will be forced to complete a self-assessment tax return when they otherwise wouldn’t and many more will be required to laboriously keep records of when they were and weren’t at home.

“It’s also likely to reduce accommodation availability and choice because many “landlords” will simply choose not to rent out their spare rooms when they are not present.

“Rent-a-room relief is one of the few ways in which people can supplement their annual earnings in a relatively simple and tax efficient manner but this new test will change that.”

Hall added: “If no proof is required then the scheme will be open to widespread abuse. If proof is required, it’s difficult to see exactly how shared occupancy can be proven in practice, especially when this may relate to irregular nights here and there. Enforcement will be a nightmare and I’m not sure HMRC have properly thought that through.

“A shared occupancy test is a headache being created for what the Treasury’s own analysis states will be a “negligible” impact on tax receipts.

“The best solution for landlords, tenants, policymakers and the economy would be to drop these plans and allow rent-a-room relief to continue as it has for over 25 years as a simple to administer, easy to understand tax relief that’s available to all.”

About the Author: Em Morley (she/they)

Em is the Content Marketing Manager for Just Landlords, with over five years of experience writing for insurance and property websites. Together with the knowledge and expertise of the Just Landlords underwriting team, Em aims to provide those in the property industry with helpful resources. When she’s not at her computer researching and writing property and insurance guides, you’ll find her exploring the British countryside, searching for geocaches.

Share this article:

Related Posts


Looking for suitable
insurance for your
Check out our four
covers for landlords